Not what you're
looking for? Try an advanced search.
McAllister v. McDermott, Inc.
United States District Court, M.D. Louisiana
October 31, 2019
JAMES T. McALLISTER, JR.
v.
McDERMOTT, INC., f/k/a J. RAY McDERMOTT & CO., INC., ET AL.
ORDER
RICHARD L. BOURGEOIS, JR. UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE.
Before
the Court are the following motions pertaining to discovery
and the discovery deadlines:
• Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Directed to Defendant
Weir Valves & Controls, Inc. d/b/a Atwood & Morrill
(“Weir”) (R. Doc. 114);
• Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Directed to Defendant
The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company
(“Goodyear”) (R. Doc. 115);[1]
• Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Directed to Defendant
Tate Andale, Inc. (“Tate Andale”) (R. Doc. 121);
• Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Directed to Defendant
McDermott, Inc. (“McDermott”) (R. Doc.
147);[2]
• Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Discovery Directed to
Defendant McDermott (R. Doc. 148);[3]
• Defendant Armstrong International, Inc's
(“Armstrong”) Motion to Amend Scheduling Order
(R. Doc. 156);[4]
• Defendant McDermott's Motion for Leave to
Substitute Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion to Compel (R.
Doc. 159);
• Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Directed to Defendant
Tate Andale (R. Doc. 160);[5]
• Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Directed to Defendant
Armstrong (R. Doc. 161);
• Plaintiff's Motion for Substitution of Pleadings
Related to Rec. Doc. No. 115 (R. Doc. 162);
• Plaintiff's Substitute Motion to Compel Directed
to Defendant Goodyear (R. Doc. 163);
• Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Directed to Defendant
The Nash Engineering Company (“Nash”) (R. Doc.
164);
• Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Directed to Defendant
Spirax Sarco, Inc. (“Spirax”) (R. Doc. 165);
• Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Discovery Directed to
Defendant Armstrong (R. Doc. 166);
• Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Discovery Directed to
Defendant Aurora Pump Company ...