Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Torregano v. Sader Power, LLC

United States District Court, E.D. Louisiana

February 28, 2019

TWYLA TORREGANO, CLEMENT TORREGANO, JR., AND ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED
v.
SADER POWER, LLC, SADER POWER ENTERPRISES, LLC, AND GRISWOLD POWER, LLC

         SECTION: "S" (3)

          FINAL JUDGMENT

          MARY ANN VIAL LEMMON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

         This matter came before the Court on the 20th day of February, 2019, on the Motion of the Plaintiffs, Twyla Torregano, Clement Torregano, Jr., and John Pooler (“Plaintiffs”), in the putative class action for final approval of their class action settlement with Defendant, Griswold Power, LLC (“GP”). Having reviewed and considered all timely submissions made in connection with the proposed settlement, and having reviewed and considered the files and records herein, the Court finds and concludes as follows:

         IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED:

         1. Capitalized terms not otherwise defined herein shall have the same meaning ascribed thereto in the Settlement Agreement.

         2. The Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of this lawsuit, and over all parties to this lawsuit, including all Class Members, as such term is defined in the Settlement Agreement.

         3. The Court has determined that the Class Notice given to the Class Members fully and accurately informed the Class Members of all material elements of the proposed settlement, constituted the best notice practicable under the circumstances, and fully complied with the requirements of due process and applicable, rules, statutes, and law.

         4. The Court now finds and concludes that:

(a) the Class Members are so numerous that joinder of separate lawsuits on behalf of all Class Members is impracticable;
(b) there are questions of law and fact common to the Class;
(c) the claims of the Class Representatives are typical of the claims of the Class;
(d) the Class Representatives and Class Counsel have fairly and adequately represented and protected the interest of the Class Members at all times;
(e) the Solar Power Maintenance Agreements that Class Members entered into with GP are substantially similar to that signed by the Class Representatives;
(f) the Solar Panel Arrays installed on the Properties of the Class Representatives are substantially similar to those installed on the ...

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.