Searching over 5,500,000 cases.

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

State v. Ducote

Court of Appeals of Louisiana, First Circuit

April 12, 2017


         On Appeal from the 22nd Judicial District Court In and for the Parish of St. Tammany State of Louisiana Trial Court No. 566, 099 Honorable Allison H. Penzato, Judge Presiding

          Frederick H. Kroenke, Jr. Attorney for Defendant-Appellant Terry Joseph Ducote

          Warren L. Montgomery Matthew Caplan Attorneys for Appellee


          HIGGINBOTHAM, J.

         The defendant, Terry J. Ducote, was charged by bill of information with simple rape, a violation of Louisiana Revised Statutes 14:43 (prior to amendment by 2015 La. Acts, No. 184 §1 & No. 256 §1). He entered a plea of not guilty and, following a jury trial, was found guilty as charged. He filed motions for postverdict judgment of acquittal and new trial, both of which were denied. The defendant was sentenced to fourteen years at hard labor without benefit of parole. He filed a motion to reconsider sentence, which was denied. He now appeals, challenging his sentence as excessive.


         On June 27, 2015, the victim, A.D.[1], who was eighteen years old, went to New Orleans with her mom, sister, stepfather, stepsister, and her stepbrother, the defendant, to visit a park and museum. When they returned home to the defendant's father's house, the defendant, the victim, and the victim's sister walked to a gas station, and the defendant purchased a bottle of vodka. The three of them then returned home and smoked marijuana in the defendant's vehicle. The victim testified that she smoked "one or two joints and two or three pulls from the pipe." She stated that she felt "[r]eally relaxed and calm." Afterward, they went back inside. The victim's sister went into her bedroom, and the victim and the defendant went into the defendant's bedroom "to hang out more" and drink alcohol.[2] The victim consumed about five or six shots of vodka, but the defendant did not drink any. The victim testified that the marijuana combined with the vodka "made it to where [her] body started getting so relaxed that [she] wasn't able to really move it." She also testified that she began to feel dizzy. According to the victim, she was seated on the defendant's bed, and the defendant was seated on the floor. She testified that the defendant began touching her thigh, and she told him to stop more than once. Rather than stop, the defendant began to get on top of the victim. At that point, according to the victim, she "wasn't really able to speak anymore because of the intoxication and being high."

         The defendant began to undress the victim, but she "blacked out, and after that [she] remember[s] laying on the bed with [her] head by the pillows and him being on top of [her]." The victim testified that the defendant had vaginal sexual intercourse with her, and she did not give him permission to do so. The victim further testified that the defendant only stopped because she "was able to sober up" and tell the defendant that "it was hurting[.]" She stated that the defendant checked, and she was bleeding. Afterward, the victim fell asleep on the floor.

         The next day, she packed her belongings and walked into the living room. She sent a text message explaining what happened to her sister, who was also in the living room. After receiving the text messages, the victim's sister contacted their father who came and picked up the victim. The defendant also exchanged text messages with the victim prior to her leaving the house. The victim sent a message to the defendant stating, "I kept telling you no, so why did you keep going? The only reason it happened was because I was too f***ed up. You basically raped me." The defendant sent a message to the victim stating, "Last night should have never happened. I don't like being like that. I can't stand doing anything with anybody, when one of us isn't sober or at least can't think straight." He also sent messages stating, "If I could undo what's been done, I would[;]" "I couldn't control myself last night[;]" and "Please don't hate me. I f***ed up and I know it."

         The victim's father testified that he received a telephone call from the victim's sister who was upset and crying. After talking to the victim's sister, he left work and went to the defendant's father's house to pick up the victim. Upon his arrival, the defendant approached him and attempted to apologize and "explain [himself], " but the victim's father, who saw the victim sitting in the fetal position on the couch, helped her get her belongings and drove her straight to the police station. The victim was then taken to Slidell Memorial Hospital for a rape examination, where the doctor found a tear on her vaginal wall.

         On June 28, 2015, the defendant was interviewed and gave an audio and video-recorded statement. The defendant also testified at trial. According to his testimony at trial, he performed oral sex on the victim on Friday, June 26, 2015, the day before the alleged rape. On cross-examination, he admitted that he did not mention that alleged sexual encounter during his videotaped interview. The defendant further testified that on Saturday, June 27, 2015, he and the victim smoked marijuana and sat in his car from 11:00 p.m. until 3:00 or 4:00 a.m. The defendant claimed that the victim stumbled "a little bit" but had steady hands and speech. He claimed that afterward, the two talked in his bedroom, and he fell asleep. The defendant testified that the victim drank vodka and drew on a plastic fish aquarium that was in his room. The defendant did not drink the vodka, but claimed that he "consumed a couple of alcoholic beverages" earlier that day at the park as well as when they arrived home from the park. He claimed that he did not mention his alcohol consumption to police officers because he did not "remember it until later." According to the defendant, when he woke up, the victim was on top of him, kissing him. He testified that he "didn't think anything out of it anymore" because they "messed around the night before." He testified that the two engaged in sexual intercourse and that the victim consented.


         In his sole assignment of error, the defendant argues that the sentence imposed by the district court is excessive. Specifically, the defendant argues that the district court failed to consider factors surrounding the offense and offender including the fact that the defendant was twenty-three years old at the time of offense, did not have a felony record, was intoxicated at the ...

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.