LOUISIANA BOARD OF ETHICS IN THE MATTER OF HARTMAN ENGINEERING, INC.
Engineering, Inc., applying for supervisory writs, Ethics
Adjudicatory Board, No. 2015-9973.
BEFORE: WELCH, CRAIN AND HOLDRIDGE, JJ.
writ application fails to provide proof that the October 10,
2016 return date was timely under Rule 4-3, Uniform Rules of
Louisiana Courts of Appeal, in accordance with the provisions
of La. Code Civ. P. art. 1914(A) and (B) . The return date
was set more than 30 days after the July 21, 2016 hearing.
Applicant failed to comply with Rule 4-5, Uniform Rules of
Louisiana Courts of Appeal, in that the writ application does
not contain a copy of pertinent minutes or a transcript. The
Order Denying Exception of No Cause of Action states that the
matter came before the Ethics Adjudicatory Board for hearing;
however, there is no evidence that a judgment was ordered by
the board or that a request for a written judgment was made
within ten days of the ruling in open court so as to make the
notice of intent timely under Rules 4-2 and 4-3. See
La. Code Civ. P. art. 1914 (A) and (B).
of this writ application and/or an application for rehearing
will not be considered. Uniform Rules of Louisiana Courts of
Appeal, Rules 4-9 and 2-18.7.
event Applicant seeks to file a new application with this
Court, it must contain all pertinent documentation, including
documentation to show that the original writ application was
timely, and must comply with Rules 2-12.2 of the Uniform
Rules of Louisiana Courts of Appeal. Any new application must
be filed on or before January 24, 2017 and must contain a
copy of this ruling.