United States District Court, M.D. Louisiana
MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
RICHARD L. BOURGEOIS, Jr., Magistrate Judge.
This matter is before the Court on the Order to the plaintiff to pay, within thirty (30) days, the full amount of the Court's filing fee (R. Doc. 3).
On April 10, 2015, pursuant to the "three strikes" provision of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), this Court denied the plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis herein and ordered him to pay, within 30 days, the full amount of the Court's filing fee. See R. Doc. 3. The plaintiff was placed on notice that a failure to comply with the Court's Order "shall result in the dismissal of the plaintiff's Complaint without further notice from the Court." Id.
In accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 1915, all prisoners granted in forma pauperis status are required to pay the full amount of the Court's filing fee. This statute further provides that, with one exception, an inmate may make the required payment over time in incremental installments. However, such incremental payments are not allowed, and pauper status shall be denied, where the inmate has filed, on at least three prior occasions, actions or appeals in the federal courts that have been dismissed as legally baseless. Specifically:
In no event shall a prisoner bring a civil action or appeal a judgment in a civil action or proceeding under this section if the prisoner has, on 3 or more prior occasions, while incarcerated or detained in any facility, brought an action or appeal in a court of the United States that was dismissed on the grounds that it is frivolous, malicious, or fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, unless the prisoner is under imminent danger of serious physical injury.
28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).
In the instant case, the plaintiff has, on three or more prior occasions while incarcerated, brought actions or appeals in the federal courts that have been dismissed as frivolous or for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Accordingly, pursuant to Adepegba v. Hammons, 103 F.3d 383 (5th Cir. 1996), this Court entered an Order directing the plaintiff to pay the full amount of the Court's filing fee. A review of the record by the Court now reflects that the plaintiff has failed to comply with the Court's Order in this regard. Accordingly, the plaintiff's action is subject to dismissal for failure to pay the Court's filing fee.
It is recommended that the plaintiff's Complaint be dismissed, without prejudice, for failure to ...