Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Grace v. Warden Louisiana State Penitentiary

United States District Court, W.D. Louisiana

May 8, 2015

CHARLES GRACE LA. DOC #349508,
v.
WARDEN LOUISIANA STATE PENITENTIARY, Section P

JUDGMENT

RICHARD T. HAIK, Sr., District Judge.

For the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge previously filed herein, and after an independent review of the record including the objections filed by petitioner, and having determined that the findings and recommendation are correct under the applicable law;

IT IS ORDERED that Claims 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 of the instant petition for federal habeas corpus relief (that the admission of statements of deceased co-conspirator Tony Thomas was in violation of petitioner's Sixth Amendment right to confront his accusers; that petitioner's Sixth Amendment right to Compulsory Process was denied when the trial court denied petitioner's request to allow six alibi witnesses to testify because of a discovery violation (late disclosure); the State knowingly presented the alleged perjured testimony of Detective Chatuese Richard; ineffective assistance of appellate counsel because appellate counsel failed to raise a claim of ineffective assistance of trial counsel for (a) failing to comply with discovery rules regarding alibi witness disclosure and (b) failing to request a cautionary charge concerning accomplice testimony; and ineffective assistance of counsel because counsel (a) failed to investigate or interview alibi witnesses, (b) failed to provide the State with the names of alibi witnesses in response to discovery, (c) failed to file a Motion to Quash or object to the conspiracy to commit armed robbery charges when petition had also been charged with armed robbery based on double jeopardy grounds, and (d) failed to request a cautionary charge concerning accomplice testimony) are DENIED AND DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE because these claims are procedurally defaulted.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED the Claim 1 of the instant petition (that there was insufficient evidence to support petitioner's convictions) shall remain pending for further proceedings.


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.