Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Costales v. James

United States District Court, M.D. Louisiana

April 28, 2015

JOHN P. COSTALES, JR
v.
DAVID JAMES

RULING AND ORDER

BRIAN A. JACKSON, Chief District Judge.

On March 18, 2015, the United States Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), recommending that Plaintiff John P. Costales, Jr.'s ("Plaintiff") Motion to Amend Judgment (Doc. 37), which the Court treated as a motion for relief from judgment under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60, be denied. (Doc. 40).

The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation specifically notified Plaintiff that, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), he had fourteen (14) days from the date he received the Report and Recommendation to file written objections to the proposed findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommendations therein. (Doc. 40 at p. 1). A review of the record indicates that Plaintiff has not filed any objections to date.

Having carefully considered the Plaintiff's motion and related filings, the Court approves the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, and hereby adopts its findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommendation.

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge's Report (Doc. 40) is ADOPTED as the Court's opinion herein.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion to Amend Judgment (Doc. 37), treated as a motion for relief from judgment, be DENIED.


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.