Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

State v. Russell

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fifth Circuit

January 28, 2015

STATE OF LOUISIANA
v.
TONY A. RUSSELL

ON APPEAL FROM THE TWENTY-FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF LOUISIANA. NO. 11-4200, DIVISION " D" . HONORABLE ROBERT M. MURPHY, JUDGE PRESIDING.

PAUL D. CONNICK, JR., DISTRICT ATTORNEY, TERRY M. BOUDREAUX, ASSISTANT DISTRICT ATTORNEY, TWENTY-FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT, PARISH OF JEFFERSON, Gretna, Louisiana, COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF/APPELLEE.

POWELL W. MILLER, ATTORNEY AT LAW, Louisiana Appellate Project, New Orleans, Louisiana, COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT/APPELLANT.

TONY RUSSELL, In Proper Person, Kinder, Louisiana, DEFENDANT/APPELLANT.

Panel composed of Judges Fredericka Homberg Wicker, Robert A. Chaisson, and Hans J. Liljeberg.

OPINION

FREDERICKA HOMBERG WICKER, Judge.

[14-841 La.App. 5 Cir. 2] Defendant, Tony Russell, appeals his convictions and sentences after pleading guilty to one count of possession of a firearm by a convicted felon, in violation of La. R.S. 14:95.1, and one count of possession of a firearm while in possession of a controlled dangerous substance, to wit: cocaine, in violation of La. R.S. 14:95E. For the reasons that follow, we find that the trial court did not have jurisdiction to grant Mr. Russell's request for an out-of-time appeal. Accordingly, Mr. Russell's appeal is dismissed.

Page 918

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

On August 23, 2011, the Jefferson Parish District Attorney filed a bill of information charging Mr. Russell with one count of possession of a firearm by a convicted felon, in violation of La. R.S. 14:95.1, and one count of possession of a firearm while in possession of a controlled dangerous substance, to wit: cocaine, in violation of La. R.S. 14:95E.[1] Mr. Russell pled not guilty to the charged offenses at his arraignment on September 27, 2011.

[14-841 La.App. 5 Cir. 3] On June 21, 2012, Mr. Russell withdrew his plea of not guilty and pled guilty to both counts. The trial court sentenced Mr. Russell to fifteen years imprisonment at hard labor, to be served without benefit of probation and parole.[2] The trial court ordered that Mr. Russell's sentences run concurrently. Mr. Russell did not seek an appeal of his convictions or sentences.

On March 20, 2014, Mr. Russell filed a Uniform Application for Post-Conviction Relief, which was later denied by the trial court. Mr. Russell subsequently filed a writ application with this Court seeking supervisory review of the trial court's judgment denying his Application for Post-Conviction Relief.[3] On July 23, 2014, this Court denied Mr. Russell's writ application, finding no error in the trial court's prior judgment.[4]

On August 25, 2014, Mr. Russell filed a motion for out-of-time appeal, which was granted by the trial court on September 11, 2014. In granting defendant's motion, the trial court stated that it would " construe petitioner's pleading as" an application for post-conviction relief, thus, concluding that defendant's motion was within the time limit for seeking an out-of-time appeal.

DISCUSSION

Louisiana Code of Criminal Procedure Article 914 describes the procedural requirements for appeals of criminal convictions and sentences. According to Louisiana Code of Criminal Procedure Article 914, a motion for an appeal in a criminal matter must be made either " [t]hirty days after the rendition of the [14-841 La.App. 5 Cir. 4] judgment or ruling from which the appeal is taken," or " [t]hirty days from the ruling on a motion to reconsider sentence filed pursuant to Article 881.1, should such a motion be filed." When a defendant fails to file a timely Motion for Appeal, his conviction and sentence are final. State v. Hollins, 98-768 (La.App. 5 Cir. 01/13/99), 726 So.2d 448, 449. In this case, Mr.

Page 919

Russell failed to file a timely motion for appeal under Louisiana Code of Criminal Procedure Article 914. Therefore, Mr. Russell's sole vehicle for obtaining an appeal was to seek reinstatement of his right to appeal in the trial court. State v. Counterman, 475 So.2d 336, 340 (La. 1985).

The appropriate procedural remedy for a defendant seeking to exercise his right to appeal after his conviction and sentence becomes final is an application for post-conviction relief pursuant to Louisiana Code of Criminal Procedure Articles 924-930.7. State v. Gray, 902 So.2d 1060, 1061 (La.App. 5 Cir. 2005), . However, Louisiana Code of Criminal Procedure Article 930.8 provides that applications for post-conviction relief, including requests for out-of-time appeals, must be filed within two years from the date that a defendant's conviction and sentence become final, unless certain specific exceptions apply.[5]

[14-841 La.App. 5 Cir. 5] The trial court does not have jurisdiction to grant an untimely application for an out-of-time appeal absent showing an exception to the time limitation as provided for by Article 930.8. State v. Daigle, 593 So.2d 676 (La.App. 3 Cir. 1991), writ denied, 604 So.2d 980 (La. 1992).[6] This Court may address the untimeliness of an application on its own motion. State ex rel. Glover, 93-2330 (La. 9/5/95), 660 So.2d 1189.

In this case, Mr. Russell's conviction and sentence became final on July 21, 2012. Pursuant to Louisiana Code of Criminal Procedure Article 930.8, Mr. Russell's right to request an out-of-time appeal expired on July 21, 2014. In his request for an out-of-time appeal, Mr. Russell did not claim that any of the enumerated exceptions to the time limitation contained in Louisiana Code of Criminal Procedure Article 930.8 apply to his conviction. Accordingly,

Page 920

Mr. Russell's August 25, 2014 motion for out-of-time appeal, which the trial court construed as an application for post-conviction relief, was untimely. Because the time delays in Louisiana Code of Criminal Procedure Article 930.8 are jurisdictional, the trial court had no authority to grant Mr. Russell's request for an out-of-time appeal. Accordingly, Mr. Russell's appeal is dismissed.

CONCLUSION

For the foregoing reasons, Mr. Russell's untimely request for an out-of-time appeal is dismissed.

DISMISSED


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.