Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Luv N' Care, Ltd. v. Rimar

United States District Court, W.D. Louisiana, Monroe Division

December 9, 2014

LUV N' CARE, LTD
v.
GROUPO RIMAR, AKA SUAVINEX

For Luv N Care Ltd, Plaintiff, Counter Defendant: Joseph D Guerriero, LEAD ATTORNEY, Monroe, LA.

For Groupo Rimar, also known as Suavinex S A, Groupo Rimar, Defendants, Counter Claimants: Christopher Roth, LEAD ATTORNEY, PRO HAC VICE, Banner & Witcoff, Washington, DC; Robert F. Altherr, Jr., LEAD ATTORNEY, PRO HAC VICE, Banner & Witcoff, Washington, DC; Robert M Baldwin, LEAD ATTORNEY, Hudson Potts & Bernstein, Monroe, LA.

ROBERT G. JAMES, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE. MAG. JUDGE KAREN L. HAYES.

JUDGMENT

ROBERT G. JAMES, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge [Doc. No. 11] having been considered, no objections thereto having been filed, and finding that same is supported by the law and the record in this matter, IT IS ORDERED that the motion to dismiss for insufficient service of process, Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(5) [Doc. No. 5], filed by defendant Groupo Rimar, AKA Suavinex, SA is DENIED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff's prior service attempt, reflected in [Doc. No. 4] is QUASHED. Plaintiff shall proceed to serve defendant in accordance with Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.